Here is an overview on the main types of validity used for the scientific method.
"Any research can be affected by different kinds of factors which, while extraneous to the concerns of the research, can invalidate the findings" (Seliger & Shohamy 1989, 95).
Let's take a look on the the most frequent uses of validity in the scientific method:
External validity is about generalization: To what extent can an effect in research, be generalized to populations, settings, treatment variables, and measurement variables?
External validity is usually split into two distinct types, population validity and ecological validity and they are both essential elements in judging the strength of an experimental design.
Internal validity is a measure which ensures that a researcher's experiment design closely follows the principle of cause and effect.
“Could there be an alternative cause, or causes, that explain my observations and results?”
Test validity is an indicator of how much meaning can be placed upon a set of test results.
Criterion Validity assesses whether a test reflects a certain set of abilities.
Content validity is the estimate of how much a measure represents every single element of a construct.
Construct validity defines how well a test or experiment measures up to its claims. A test designed to measure depression must only measure that particular construct, not closely related ideals such as anxiety or stress.
Face validity is a measure of how representative a research project is ‘at face value,' and whether it appears to be a good project.
Martyn Shuttleworth (Nov 8, 2009). Types of Validity. Retrieved May 30, 2023 from Assisted Self-Help: https://app.assistertselvhjelp.no/en/types-of-validity